HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7390 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State and Ms. Mrigakshi Naman, learned Advocate, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.4 by filing Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that FIR has been lodged against petitioner no.2,therefore, this petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further requested that he may be permitted to file a fresh petition challenging the FIR. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. 5. It is needless to say that any aggrieved parties may file appropriate petition before the appropriate court of law. August 27, 2025 dk/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Pragya Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench