HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23600 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. On 23.07.2025, the matter was heard and the Court was of the view to dismiss the writ petition with exemplary costs. However, learned counsel for the petitioner sought and was granted two weeks' time to obtain further instructions. Thereafter, on 11.08.2025, the matter was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner. On 15.09.2025, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned for two weeks. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up in the revised list, Shri Ankit Kumar, learned proxy counsel appearing for Shri Namit Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought an adjournment. No sufficient ground has been made out for granting adjournment. Accordingly, the prayer for adjournment is rejected. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. April 2, 2026 Shafique Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Namit Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Nagar Nigam Meerut .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad