Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49259 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 783 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shobhnath Respondent :- Settlement Officer Of Consolidation, Distt. Ambedkar Nagar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Nag,Sunil Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. (Order on Application for amendment) 1. Heard Sri Jai Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner presses this application for amendment. 3. In view of the facts stated in the affidavit filed in support of application for amendment, the application in question is allowed. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner prays for and is directed to make necessary amendment in the memo of writ petition during course of the day. (Order on Writ Petition) 1. Heard Sri Jai Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in proceeding arising out of Section 12 of Consolidation of Holding Act the appeal preferred by the petitioner before the Settlement Officer Consolidation was allowed on 17.03.2025 pursuant to which proceedings U/S 109(A) of the Consolidation of Holding Rules were initiated. 3. The private respondents had preferred an appeal against the order dated 17.03.2025 before the Settlement Officer Consolidation who has stayed the proceedings U/S 109(A) by means of order dated 25.01.2025 and in the present writ petition the order dated 25.01.2025 has been challenged. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the revision against the order of the Settlement Officer Consolidation dated 17.03.2025 is already pending before the Dy. Director of Consolidation and the controversy would stand settled only after appropriate orders are passed by the Dy. Director of Consolidation. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid facts and submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case Dy. Director of Consolidation is directed to consider and decide the revision within stipulated time. 6. Accordingly, in the light of the above and with the consent of parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Dy. Director of Consolation to decide the revision No. 59 of 2025 expeditiously, say, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law after giving full opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 22.8.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench