APHC010201012019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8699/2019 Between: 1. PENUMAKA SANDHYA, W/O. RAJASEKAR JOSH', AGED 40 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. F.NO.T1, 4TH FLOOR, RADHAKRISHNA APARTMENTS, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STAET OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT AP.SECRATARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH TADEPALLY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFFICE, , SURYARAOPET POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SMT PENUMAKA ARUNA, W/O SUNIL KUMAR OCC ASST GOVT PLEADER,HIGH COURT OF AP, R/O VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BARRE SREENIVASARAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8699 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 26.06.2019 for removing the 5th respondent from the post of the Asst. Government pleader and not to continue her in the Govt. Service is illegal , arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.06.2019 and take necessary action against the respondent No. 5 and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.09.2025 Pmk 4 06 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:8699 OF 2019 Date: 03.09.2025 Pmk