1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.83 of 2025 Date of decision: 19.08.2025 Onkar Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P.&Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Ms. Reeta Hingman, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks enforcement of decision rendered in Onkar Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Ors1, wherein directions were issued to the respondents to re-examine and consider the case of the petitioner afresh for grant of benefit under Assured Career Progression Scheme (4-9-14), within four weeks. 2. Respondents have filed the compliance affidavit. In terms thereof, the case of the petitioner has been considered and order has been passed by the respondents on 24.07.2025 (Annexure E-3). 1CWPOA No.5949 of 2020 decided on 14.12.2023. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the office order dated 24.07.2025 (Annexure E-3) is not in consonance with the petitioner’s entitlement. Further, the benefits to which the petitioner has been held entitled under the said office order have not been released to him till date. 4. It shall be open for the petitioner to assail the office order dated 24.07.2025 in accordance with law. In view of the above, the present proceedings are closed with directions to the respondents to release the due and admissible benefits to the petitioner under the office order dated 24.07.2025 within six weeks from today. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 19thAugust, 2025 Judge (R.Atal)