Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15732 (KAR)

SMT SWARNA JAYASHEELA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1166/2023 · 2025-07-10

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25342 CRL.P No. 1166 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1166 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT SWARNA JAYASHEELA D/O LATE SWARNA DEVARAJU AGED 35 YEARS R/AT 10 B-C, HUDCO COLONY NEW TOWN, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT-577302 2. MR. SANDEEPA ALIS DEEPU S/O ANANTHA KUMAR AGED 30 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 09/142, PAPER TOWN BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT-577302 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS C H, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY INDIRANAGAR POLICE STATION BANGALORE, REP BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560001 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25342 CRL.P No. 1166 of 2023 2. SMT VICTORIA RAANI W/O VENKATESH N AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO 66, 1ST CROSS, KADIRAYYANA PALYA, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE-560038 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATYANARAYAN.A, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED AGAINST THEM AND ACCUSED NO.3 IN C.C.NO.53608/2020 (CR.NO.258/2019) BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT i.e INDIRANAGAR POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323,448,504,506 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHO HAVE BEEN ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2, RESPECTIVELY, WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE 10TH ADDL.METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. This matter is of the year 2022. Vide order dated 01.07.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25342 CRL.P No. 1166 of 2023 complied with, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5