ABHISEKH S/O SHRI UDAYNARAYAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/481/2025 · 2025-07-04
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15731 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15731 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24644-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 481/2025 Abhisekh S/o Shri Udaynarayan, R/o Kumawat Colony, Gali No. A/5, Plot No. 3, Police Station Jhotwara, Distirct Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur (Raj.). Through His Brother Andand Kumar Singh S/o Shri Udaynarayan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 6, Sri Ram Nagar Colony, Lata Cinema, Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Joint Secretary Home (Group-12), Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Prisons Parole Advisory Committee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan.
3. The Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/07/2025 AVNEESH JHINGAN, J:-
1. This petition is filed aggrieved of order dated 06.04.2025 whereby the prayer for permanent parole of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that for consideration of the application, the convict should have to undergo 14 years of custody.
2. Reliance is placed by learned counsel for the petitioner on the decision of this Court in the case of Heeralal S/o Shri Dalla Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition
[2025:RJ-JP:24644-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-481/2025] No.1828/2023) to submit that the ground for rejection in the impugned order is unsustainable.
3. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General on specific instructions fairly submits that the case of the petitioner shall be reconsidered.
4. In view of the above, the impugned order qua the petitioner is set aside. The writ petition is disposed of.
5. Let respondent reconsider the application of the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Sudeepak/38