2025:JHHC:27734 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3224 of 2024 ---- Dhananjay Singh, aged about 46 years, Son of Ram Awadhesh Singh, resident of House No.598, Line No.05, Garabasa, P.O Golmuri, P.S Golmuri, District-East Singhbhum …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. District Magistrate, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O & P.S-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 3. Managing Director, Tata Steel, having its office at Q5XR+JGR, Ambagan, Northern Town, Jamshedpur, P.O.-Jamshedpur, P.S.-Jamshedpur, Jamshedpur. District-East Singhbhum 4. General Manager, Tata Steel, having its office at Q5XR+JGR, Ambagan, Northern Town, Jamshedpur, P.O.-Jamshedpur, P.S.-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 5. Head of the Department of Contract Sail, Tata Steel, having its office at Q5XR+JGR, Ambagan, Northern Town, Jamshedpur, P.O.-Jamshedpur, P.S.- Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Peeyush Krishna Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, SC-V ---- 07/Dated: 11th September, 2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “(i). For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to give direction respondent No.4 & 5 to return back the gate pass and R.F.D of the petitioner, which has illegally seized by the respondent No.4 and 5 without any cogent ground. (ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon respondents to give direction to the respondent No.2 to look to the matter and return back the gate pass and R.F.D of the petitioner, which 2025:JHHC:27734` 2 W.P.C No.3224 of 2024 has illegally seized by the respondent No.4 and 5 without any cogent ground.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded