Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15730 (PAT)

Arun Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/10309/2017 · 2025-04-28

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10309 of 2017 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Gupta s/o Late Tej Narayan Prasad Sah resident of village - Sharshaula Khurd, P.S. and Dist - Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, Dist - Muzaffarpur. 3. The District Magistrate, Sheohar, Dist - Sheohar. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms D.C.L.R., Sheohar, Dist - Sheohar. 5. The Circle Officer, Sheohar, Dist - Sheohar. 6. Gyani Paswan s/o Late Bujhawan Paswan resident of village - Kothiya Dharmagat, P.S. and Distt - Sheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Nutan Sahay-AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2025 Heard Mr. Mahendra Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nutan Sahay, learned A.C to A.A.G. 12. 2. The present application has been filed: for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 8.2.2017, passed by the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur (Respondent No -2) in connection with Settlement Revision Case No-186/2016, filed by Respondent No- 6, Whereby and where under the Respondent No- 2, has allowed the Revision Application by setting a side the well discussed order dated 9.8.2016, passed Patna High Court CWJC No.10309 of 2017(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 by the Respondent No-3, in Land Settlement Appeal Case No- 10/2013, filed by the petitioner and for any other Writ/Writs, Direction/Directions, Order/Orders, as this Hon'ble Court thinks fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be invoking appropriate jurisdiction for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U