Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47178 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4813 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar And Another Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (J), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent no.2, is dispensed with. 2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "I. Issue a direction thereby directing the opposite party no.1 to decide the pending Revision No. 558 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000558" Suresh Kumar and others Vs. Shiv Mangal and others: filed under Section 219 of U.P. L.R. Act, pending in the court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial)- Ayodhya Division Ayodhya dated fixed as 04.08.2025, expeditiously within stipulated period as prescribed by this Honb'le Court, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. II. Issue a direction thereby directing the opposite party no.1 to hear and decide the pending stay application moved in Revision No. 558 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000558" Suresh Kumar and others Vs. Shiv Mangal and others: filed under Section 219 of U.P. L.R. Act, pending in the court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial)- Ayodhya Division Ayodhya dated fixed as 04.08.2025, expeditiously within stipulated period as prescribed by this Honb'le Court, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition." 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the revision preferred by the petitioner has been admitted but no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next six weeks. 6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench