Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157274 (ALL)

KANTI v. THE COURT OF LEARNED NAYAB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/4814/2025 · 2025-08-12

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47177 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4814 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kanti Respondent :- The Court Of Learned Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Maya Ram Yadav,Akhand Pratap Verma,Jitesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 i.e. the court of learned Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya to decide the Mutation Case No. 4522 of 2018 bearing computerized Case No. T20184230304522; (Kanti Vs. Saroj Kumari and others), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for entering name into revenue record, expeditiously as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit which is pending before the opposite party n.1 since 06.11.2018, (contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition), in the interest of justice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent 1 i.e. the court of learned Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Mutation Case No. 4522 of 2018 bearing computerized Case No. T20184230304522; (Kanti Vs. Saroj Kumari and others), under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench