HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7357 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Alok Srivastava-II, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate, Sri Prashant Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4 and perused the record. 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR bearing FIR No.197 of 2025, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Antu, District Pratapgarh. 4. At the very outset, Sri Prashant Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4, has raised objection to the effect that the present petitioner has filed his anticipatory bail application before the District & Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh, which is still pending. 5. Replying the aforesaid objection, Sri Alok Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, has stated that anticipatory bail application has been not pressed by the petitioner. Thereafter, Sri Prashant Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4 has raised objection to the effect that other co- accused person namely Ajay Mishra & Rajendra Bahadur Singh and others, have filed writ petitions bearing Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5662 of 2025 & Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5668 of 2025 respectively, therein this Court on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner permitted to not press that petition giving liberty to file anticipatory bail application. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Prashant Shukla Rohit Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Thereafter, after arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the present petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent Court concerned and the direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition. 6. Therefore, in the light of the statement made at the Bar, without entering into the merits of the case, we hereby dispose of this writ petition finally at admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the learned Sessions Court within a period of two weeks taking all pleas and grounds, which are available to him and if such anticipatory bail application is filed within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same shall be heard and disposed of finally with expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the party. August 25, 2025 Arun CRLP No. 7357 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench