SMT. SHYAMA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/4811/2025 · 2025-08-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157264 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157264 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47180 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4811 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Shyama Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 2.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the opposite party no.2 i.e. Naib Tehsildar, Darausa, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur to decide the Mutation Application No. T-202304680705250, titled as Smt. Shyama Devi Vs. Raj Bahadur, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within reasonable time, in the interest of justice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, the opposite party no.2 i.e. Naib Tehsildar, Darausa, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Mutation Application No. T-202304680705250, titled as Smt. Shyama Devi Vs. Raj Bahadur, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment
shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench