Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110615 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4547 of 2025 Applicant :- Rahul Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Srivastava,Kalp Dev Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Kalp Dev Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amit Kumar, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 291 of 2024, under Sections 80(2), 85 B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Muhammadabad, District- Ghazipur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. The FIR is delayed and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated the allegations are per se false. The cause of death has been found to be asphyxia as a result of antemortem hanging. No injury has been found on the body of the deceased person except a ligature mark on her neck. There is no criminal antecedent of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.10.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Per contra, learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the deceased had expired within the precincts of house of the applicant coupled with the fact that the FIR has been instituted promptly within a span of 2 hours and 20 minutes, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. 8. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 9. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously in view of the principle as has been laid down in the recent judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 and Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702, if there is no legal impediment. 10. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Vikas (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad