[2025:RJ-JP:37995] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5684/2012 Ganesh Narayan Saini S/o Shri Nand Ram Saini, Resident of M- 64-6D, Engineer Colony Behind Swarn Garden, Mansarovar Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan Jaipur. 2. The Sales Tax Officer (E) Zonal Tax Bhawan, Jhalana Doongri, Rajasthan Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj on behlaf of Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/09/2025 1. Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for seeking direction against the respondents to regularize the petitioner. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has shown order dated 05.12.2013 passed by Deputy Commissioner (Administration)-I Commercial Tax, Jaipur, whereby benefit of regularization has been given to the petitioner pursuant to award dated 10.06.2002 passed by the Labour Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although order of regularization dated 05.12.2013 has been passed, yet the petitioner was entitled for benefit of regularization on completion of ten years of services as referred in notification dated 27.02.2009. [2025:RJ-JP:37995] (2 of 2) [CW-5684/2012] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the benefit of regularization was required to be given in the light of order dated 28.04.2025 passed in the case of Raju Lal Saini Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4439/2016). 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition was very limited to the benefit of regularization, which has already been extended to the petitioner. 5. In view of above, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition filed by the petitioner with a direction to the petitioner to submit a representation, in case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by the date of regularization as well as grant of consequential benefits. In case, any such representation is made, the same shall be considered by the respondents in accordance with the Rules and speaking order shall be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with a certified copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that no view has been expressed by this Court on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/58