Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47617 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7753 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Tiwari Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1 and 2 and Sri Mohan Singh for opposite party No.4- Gaon Sabha. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent No.3 is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had filed an application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code before opposite party No.2 i.e. Additional District Magistrate, Lambhuwa, District Sultanpur which was allowed by means of order dated 21.10.2021. Opposite party No.3 moved application for recall of the said order which is still pending consideration before opposite party No.2 and it is during pendency of the recall application that opposite party No.3 has moved an application under Section 212 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code for transfer of the said case before another Additional District Magistrate in Sultanpur. On filing of the said application an interim order has been passed on 23.6.2025 staying the proceedings before opposite party No.2 and it is against the said order dated 23.6.2025 that the present writ petition has been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending consideration for a very long time and merely because of the interim order the recall applicaditon preferred by opposite party No.3 has been kept pending till today. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case opposite party No.1 is directed to consider and decide the application for transfer under Section 212 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents have opposed the writ petition but do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing opposite party No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the transfer application within six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law after giving full opportunity of hearing to all the parties. 7. The petitioner will be at liberty to take all the pleas and file objections against the applicaditon for transfer within next two weeks in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 14.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench