Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157223 (ALL)

DAYASHANKAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF FINANCE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9047/2025 · 2025-08-12

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46967 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9047 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dayashankar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra,S.K. Mishra Nagraha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the relevant Government Orders. 3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. 4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No.- 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others). Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Mahesh Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench