M/S. MKU LIMITED AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
W.P.(C)/4756/2025 · 2025-08-12
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Tushar Rao Gedela
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15722 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15722 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~95 & 97. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4754/2025, CM APPL. 21885/2025, CM APPL. 21886/2025, CM APPL. 21887/2025 & CM APPL. 38094/2025 MKU LIMITED AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Mr. Rajiv Dalal, Mr. Sanjeev K. Sharma, Mr. Saksham Agrawal and Mr. Kesharwani, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. Venkatramani, Attorney General of India and Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG, Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly, Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Mr. Aakash Pathak, Mr. Amit Gupta, Advs. Brig. Sidhartha Sen, Col SS Raj Purohit, Lt. Col. Gaurav, Major Anish Muralidhar Mr.Aditya Singh with Mr.Kamal Kishor, Advs for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4756/2025, CM APPL. 21893/2025, CM APPL. 21894/2025 & CM APPL. 21895/2025 M/S. MKU LIMITED AND ANR
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Mr. Rajiv Dalal, Mr. Sanjeev K. Sharma, Mr. Saksham Agrawal and Mr. Kesharwani, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. Venkatramani, Attorney This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:36:16
General of India and Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG, Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly, Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Mr. Aakash Pathak, Mr. Amit Gupta, Advs. Brig. Sidhartha Sen, Col SS Raj Purohit, Lt. Col. Gaurav, Major Anish Muralidhar CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R %
12.08.2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Mr. Jetly, CGSC representing the official respondents, on instructions, has stated that the subject tender has been foreclosed.
3. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid, the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous which are dismissed as such.
4. We make it clear that the dismissal of these petitions as having been rendered infructuous is without prejudice to the rights of the parties.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J AUGUST 12, 2025 N.Khanna This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:36:16