Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157194 (ALL)

SHESHMANI SHUKLA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/9105/2025 · 2025-08-13

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47570 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9105 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sheshmani Shukla And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Kumar Dwivedi,Dinesh Kumar Ayra,Kavita Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Shri Akbar Ahmad, learned counsel who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no. 2, 3, 4 and 6. No notice be issued to respondent no.5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for the following main relief(s): "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 (cornered authorities) to immediately process and release all pending dues including earned leave payment of 111 days as well as to grant the benefits of Super Selection Grade, Super Time Scale, and 3rd ACP (Assured Career Progression) along with differential amount of gratuity, HRA & DA of the late father of the petitioners with interest, in the interest of justice." After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Gram Vikas Bank Ltd, Lucknow which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. It is also provided that in case any dues are found admissible to the petitioners the same shall be paid within next four weeks from the date of decision on the aforesaid representation provided there is no legal impediment. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench