SUBHASH CHANDR v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE / COLLECTOR, AMETHI AND OTHERS
A227/4815/2025 · 2025-08-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157193 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47168 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4815 of 2025 Petitioner :- Subhash Chandr Respondent :- District Magistrate / Collector, Amethi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Shri Virendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondents no. 1 to 2 while notice on behalf of respondent no.9- Gram Sabha of the village concerned has been accepted by Shri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private respondents no. 4 to 8, is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that a direction be given to opposite parties no.2 and 3 to decide the representation dated 16.06.2025 in pursuance of the order dated 27.11.2015 in Case No. 124/2009 under Section 176 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act, Kamlawati Vs. Kalideen and others, relating to Village Byoremau, Rustamgarh, Pargana Jagdishpur, Tehsil Musafirkhana, District Amethi, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner requested again and again with Revenue Officers for comply of the order dated 27.11.2015, but nothing has been done till today. The private respondents continuously harassing the petitioner and damages the garden of the petitioner. 5. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is being deprived from his fundamental rights due to illegal interference of the private respondents. 6. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. 7. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and seeks liberty to approach the competent authority under Para 460 o U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. 8. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities.
In case, such an application is moved within two weeks form today, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench