SANTOSH SINGH v. SRI SURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI U.P. BASIC EDUCATION BOARD PRAYAGRAJ
CAPL/3511/2024 · 2025-01-16
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157190 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157190 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2651 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3511 of 2024 Applicant :- Santosh Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Surendra Kumar Tiwari U.P. Basic Education Board Prayagraj Counsel for Applicant :- Meenakshi Singh Parihar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ran Vijay Singh,Jyoti Prakash Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and
order dated 24.07.2024, passed by this Court in Writ A No. 5393 of 2024, whereby the respondent was directed to take a decision on the representation of the applicant, has been decided by order dated 15.10.2024, the copy of which has been placed during the course of argument, which is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order dated 24.07.2024 has been complied with and now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed, but liberty may be given to the applicant to challenge the order dated 15.10.2024 by filing a writ petition, if he is still aggrieved.
3. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law.
4. Notices, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 16.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench