Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157185 (ALL)

SHILPA v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ANOTHER

A227/4797/2025 · 2025-08-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46745 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4797 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shilpa Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, to decide the restoration application dated 01.08.2024 filed against the order dated 18.09.2023 passed in Case No.3822/2023 (Computerized Case No.T202304040203822), Shilpa vs. Santosh Kumar, under Section 34 U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide the restoration application dated 01.08.2024 filed against the order dated 18.09.2023 passed in Case No.3822/2023 (Computerized Case No.T202304040203822), Shilpa vs. Santosh Kumar, under Section 34 U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 11.8.2025 / KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench