IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3484 of 2024 ------ Shidharth Hadi @ Shidharth Kumar @ Sidhart Kumar, aged about 18 years, S/o Binda Hadi @ Birendra Hadi, R/o Bhuiya Toli, P.O. + P.S. + Dist. Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 07/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No.25 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 324, 326, 307 and 379 of Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of common object of assembly attempted to murder Pawan Yadav and committed theft of gold chain and Rs.1,30,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but subsequently, the injured in his statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. has taken the name of the petitioner to be the person who was also present. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-15 of this anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused persons have been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 25.10.2024 in A.B.A No.2992 of 2024. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the injured persons in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No.25 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the injured persons in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/