Puvvada China Satyanarayana Murthy v. Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation
SA/278/2004 · 2025-01-22
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15710 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15710 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010201192004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 278/2004 Between: Puvvada China Satyanarayana Murthy and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. P R PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent:
1. T S VENKATA RAMANA The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
In view of the death of learned counsel for the appellant(s), this Court ordered notice to the appellants. Despite the service of the notice, they have not engaged any advocate.
2. It seems that the appellants have no interest to prosecute the matter.
3. In that view, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 22.01.2025 MH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
20
S.A.NO: 278/2004
Date : 22.01.2025 MH