Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 157097 (ALL)

MOHD. SHAHNWAZ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

CRLP/7292/2025 · 2025-08-20

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48675-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7292 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Shahnwaz Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ranvijay Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party Nos. 4 to 9 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petitioner, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: "(i) to issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the opposite party no.2 to ensure free, fair, proper, impartial and speedy investigation of FIR No.0025/2025 Under Section 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) BNS, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (ii) to issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the opposite party no.3 to conclude the investigation of FIR No. 0025/2025 Under Section 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) BNS, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh within stipulatec period preferably within one month." 4. Sri Ranvijay Singh, learned AGA has produced a copy of instructions letter dated 10.08.2025 provided by one Rakesh Chaurasiya, Sub Inspector, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh addressing to the Government Advocate, same is taken on record. 5. As per the aforesaid instructions letter, the investigation has been completed and charge-sheet/police report has been sent to the Supervisory Authority and the same may be filed before the learned trial court soon. 6. Having considered the aforesaid written submission, we do not find any good ground to keep this petition pending any longer because relief prayed in the present petition may not be granted. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. However, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority/court of law for redressal of his grievance, more so bonafide grievance, if any. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Reena/- (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench