RAKESH KUMAR @ RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7305/2025 · 2025-08-20
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 157064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48830-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7305 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Madhukar Ojha, learned State counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party no.4 is dispensed with.
3. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed following main reliefs:-
"i) To issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 27.07.2025 lodged by opposite party no.4 against the petitioners vide Case Crime No. 640/2025 Under Section 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali Unnao, District Unnao as contained as Annexure no.1 to this writ petition, in the light of compromise arrived between the parties. ii) to issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite party no.1 to 3 to not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report dated 27.07.2025 lodged by opposite party no.4 against the petitioners vide Case Crime No. 640/2025 Under Section 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali Unnao, District Unnao, as contained as Annexure no.1 to this writ petition."
4. Sri Madhukar Ojha, on the basis of specific instructions, has apprised the Court that investigation has been completed and police report has been submitted before the supervisory authority and such police report may be submitted before the learned Trial Court very soon.
5. Having considered the statement of Sri Madhukar Ojha, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed being infructuous.
6. However, it is always open for the petitioners to take appropriate remedy before the competent authority/ court of law for redressal of their grievance. [Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 20.8.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench