HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5828/2025 Vijay Pvt Iti, Bandikui, District Dausa, Through Shri Sumesh Vijay S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Vijay, Aged About 38 Years Having Office At Vijay Pvt Iti, Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Deputy Director Scholarships, Social Justice And Empowerment Department Government Of Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amitosh Pareek, Dy.GC with Mr. Manish Bharadwaj JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/05/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: a) By appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 09.12.2023, whereby, the petitioner university has been put on hold from the scholarship portal, may also be quashed and set aside. The respondents may further be directed to restore the status of the petitioner university as it was existing prior to order dated 09.12.2023, b) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may be directed to release (2 of 3) [CW-5828/2025] scholarship of the students as admissible to them, for academic session of 2023-24. c) By appropriate writ, order or direction, any order passed by the respondents during the pendency of the writ petition, which is prejudicial to the interest of petitioner university may be directed to taken on record and accordingly be quashed and set aside. d) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may be directed to award cost of rupees 50,000/- in lieu of harassment caused to the petitioner university and its students. e) Any other order which this Hon'ble court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 09.12.2023 passed by the respondents, by which the petitioner institution has been put on hold from scholarship portal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for a mistake committed by one of the student, other students cannot be made sufferer. Counsel submits that after conducting inquiry, appropriate action has already been taken against the said student, so under these circumstances, appropriate directions be issued to the respondents to allow other students to access the portal for getting scholarship. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that after inspection of the petitioner institution, a recommendation has been made to remove the hold of the petitioner institution and the said recommendation is under consideration before higher authorities. 5. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that a recommendation has been made in (3 of 3) [CW-5828/2025] favour of the petitioner for removing the hold of the petitioner institution, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the respondents to take the decision upon the recommendation, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from today. 6. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/90