KRIPA SHANKAR SON OF KEDAR PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7174/2025 · 2025-09-10
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15701 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15701 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36540] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7174/2025
1. Kripa Shankar Son Of Kedar Prasad, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.)
2. Sitaram Son Of Badri Lal, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Village Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.)
3. Hari Shankar Son Of Ramrai, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Dausa District Dausa.
2. Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Lalsot District Dausa.
3. Tehsildar Lalsot, Tehsil Office Lalsot, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Narayan Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/09/2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the petition. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the respondent No.2 to consider the representation (Annexure-4) of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law and as per the facts and as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.
[2025:RJ-JP:36540] (2 of 2) [CW-7174/2025] 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /63