Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15700 (KAR)

SMT. PARVATHAMMA v. SRI. RAGHU

CRP/74/2022 · 2025-02-13

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6524 CRP No. 74 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 74 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O NAGALAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOLENARSIPURA TALUK-573211 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAGHU S/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/ O KEMPAKA NAGARA JANTHA COLONY SAKALESHAPURA TOWN HASSAN DISTRICT - 573134 2. SMT SHRUTHI W/O MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O DODDA ANKOD VILLAGE Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6524 CRP No. 74 of 2022 SOMAVAREPETE TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571236 3. SMT RATHNAMMA W/O LATE RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O NAGALAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOLENARSIPURA TALUK – 573211 4. SRI RAVI S/O LATE RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O NAGALAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOLENARSIPURA TALUK – 573211 5. SRI RAJINIKANTHA S/O LATE RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/O NAGALAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOLENARSIPURA TALUK-573211 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.10.2021 PASSED ON IA No.VI IN OS No.143/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6524 CRP No. 74 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.143/2016 was decreed on 16.02.2022. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL