Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156998 (ALL)

DR. RANJEEV KUMAR SAHU v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HIGHER EDU. MINISTRY HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/8924/2025 · 2025-09-03

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8924 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Short counter affidavit and reply thereto filed today by learned counsel for the contesting parties are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ashwani Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3. 3. Shri Nilaya Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset states that he does not intend to press on prayers no. 1 and 2 and prays that as the petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 22.8.2024, a copy of which is annexure 29 to the writ petition, wherein he has raised a challenge to the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him as such the competent authority be directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a specified time. 4. To the aforesaid prayer, Shri Ashwani Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3 have no objections. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to to the respondent no. 3 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 22.8.2024, a copy of which is annexure 29 to the writ petition, in accordance with law and relevant rules. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nilaya Gupta, Ajay Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ashwani Kumar Singh, Gaurav Rastogi, Rajesh Tiwari, Rajesh Tiwari Dr. Ranjeev Kumar Sahu .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Higher Edu. Ministry Human Resource Development, And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner the aforesaid representation would be decided within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order i.e. the time as suggested by Shri Rajesh Tiwari himself. 7. Shri Rajesh Tiwari also states that in terms of Board's resolution 86.16 dated 24.8.2024, a copy of which is annexure 30 to the writ petition, no action would be taken by the respondents till the said representation is decided. September 3, 2025 J. K. Dinkar WRIA No. 8924 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench