[2025:RJ-JP:19704] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2347/2025 Saurabh S/o Vijay @ Vijendra, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Pattikhurd, Bamanwas, Police Station Bamanwas. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confiend In Sub Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5234/2025 Pawan S/o Rajesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Pattikalan Bamanwas, Police Station Bamanwas (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner At Present In District Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5267/2025 Mahendra S/o Shrilal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Badi Udei, Police Station Sadar Gangapur City. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jyoti Kumar Saini Mr. Mahander Meena Mr. Manish K. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/05/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:19704] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2347/2025] 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0211/2024 registered at Police Station-Bamanwas, District-Gangapur City for the offences under Sections 189(2), 308(2), 140(3), 351(2), 126(2), 115(2) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that in this case complainant/injured Lokesh has settled the dispute with the present petitioners by filing a compromise deed before the trial court on 05.04.2025 and that compromise has been attested by the trial court. He further submits that complainant/injured-Lokesh has turned hostile during examination before the trial court, whose statement has been recorded as PW.1. The petitioners-Saurabh and Pawan are behind the Bar since 13.09.2024 and the petitioner-Mahendra is behind the Bar since 02.10.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on [2025:RJ-JP:19704] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2347/2025] the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Saurabh S/o Vijay @ Vijendra (2) Pawan S/o Rajesh and (3) Mahendra S/o Shrilal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/105-107