Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156982 (ALL)

NAFIS AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4800/2025 · 2025-08-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46746 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4800 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nafis And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Mishra,Arun Chand Pandey,Ram Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.3 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Amethi, to decide the Revision No.1524 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.202454047100001524) Kahkasha Begam vs. Iqbal and others, under Section 48(i) U.PC.H. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Amethi considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Revision No.1524 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.202454047100001524) Kahkasha Begam vs. Iqbal and others, under Section 48(i) U.PC.H. Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 11.8.2025 / KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench