BIJAY KUMAR MAHTO ALIAS BIJAY KR MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3045/2025 · 2025-06-05
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15697 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15697 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:14545 )
Page-1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3045 of 2025
1. Bijay Kumar Mahto @ Bijay Kr. Mahto, aged about 30 years, Son of Ganesh Mahto, resident of Village- Bachra, P.O. & P.S.- Piparwar, District- Chatra.
2. Nirmal Mahto, aged about 54 years, Son of Riman Mahto, resident of Village- Bachra, P.O. & P.S.- Piparwar, District- Chatra.
…. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
….. Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sushant Kr. Sinha, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P.
---------
Order No. 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending their arrest in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No. 51 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 145, 147, 149, 353, 427, 337, 447, 449, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence at all as alleged in the FIR. They are falsely implicated in this case, only on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that there has been no specific allegation made against the petitioners except that they along with other persons have deterred the public servant from discharging of their duty. Several Co-accused persons have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Petitioners have no criminal antecedents (mentioned in the impugned order). As such, they may be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail.
4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to these petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of
( 2025:JHHC:14545 )
Page-2
Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra.
6. It is made clear that petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation / trial. If the petitioners will not co-operate with the investigation / trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Simran-Aditi/