IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 570 of 2025 Date of Decision: 04.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Amrit Kaur …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Mr. Raj Pal Thakur, Additional Advocate Generals, Mr. Sumit Sharma, Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondent/ State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/ execute the order/judgment dated 10.01.2025, passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 16285 of 2024, titled Amrit Kaur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. 2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings, reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of the petition, directed the respondents/competent authority to consider the representation 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioner within a period of six weeks. Since, despite there being specific direction to do the needful, as taken note hereinabove, respondents have failed to do so, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 3. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment/ order must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of three weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of order/judgment dated 11.01.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, positively within a period of three weeks, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 04,2025 (shankar)