PANJABRAO SHANKARRAO MUNGAL v. DIGAMBAR SHANKARRAO MUNGAL AND ANOTHER
WP/4652/2016 · 2025-01-21
Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15697 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15697 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
946 WP NO.4651.2016 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 946 WRIT PETITION NO. 4651 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4652 OF 2016 PANJABRAO SHANKARRAO MUNGAL VERSUS DIGAMBAR SHANKARRAO MUNGAL AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. R. Devakate Advocate for Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. A. A. Mukhedkar ...
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. Dated : January 21, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition No. 4651 of 2016 is arising out of the order dated 15.02.2016 passed in Misc. Civil Application No. 82 of 2015 by learned District Court-4, Nanded. In said Misc. Civil Application, the
order dated 05.10.2015 passed below Exh. 37 in Special Civil Suit No. 37 of 2015 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, has been challenged.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition No. 4652 of 2016 is arising out of the order dated 15.02.2016 passed in Misc. Civil Application No. 49 of 2015 by learned District Court-4, Nanded. In said Misc. Civil Application, the order dated 03.07.2015 passed below Exh. 7 in Special Civil Suit No. 37 of 2015 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, has been 2025:BHC-AUG:1743
946 WP NO.4651.2016 -2- challenged.
3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner informs that now, the suit i.e. Special Civil Suit No. 37 of 2015 itself has been disposed of. Hence, nothing survives in both these writ petitions.
4. Both the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) Omkar Joshi