SMT. POONAM MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/7263/2025 · 2025-08-19
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156967 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156967 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48381-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7263 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Poonam Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar,Alpana Yadav,Sadaf Sheikh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard Dr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
"i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of of mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned to arrest the accused persons of the case crime no. 0079/2025, F.I.R. dated 18.5.2025, under section 191(2), 191(3), 110, 117(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S, P.S-Kamrauli, Distt. Amethi, and also get made the fair and proper investigation of the case in the interest of justice, after transferring the investigation of case from opp. party no.3 to any other police station. ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commending the opp. parties concerned to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and her husband of the accused persons of the F.I.R. dated 18.5.2025 of case crime no.0079/2025, under section 191(2), 191(3), 110, 117(2), 115(2), 351 (2), 352 B.N.S., P. S.-Kamrauli, Distt. Amethi, in the interest of justice. iii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. party no.2 to consider and decide the application of petitioner dated 18.7.2025 as contained in Annexure no.1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the Investigating Officer is not conducting investigation properly and supporting the accused persons. However, no specific plea or ground has been taken convincing the Court to transfer the investigation from one agency to another agency or from one police station to another police station. 4.
Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned AGA, has produced copy of
instructions letter dated 06.08.2025 provided by Ram Nath Baudh, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Kamrauli, District- Amethi wherein the fact has been indicated that the Investigating Officer is conducting the investigation properly and uptill now, seven Parchas have been prepared; statements of concerning persons have been recorded; some relevant materials have been collected and other relevant material/ evidence is being demanded from the concerning persons. The aforesaid instructions letter is taken on record. 5. Having considered the statement of learned AGA and the written instructions dated 06.08.2025, we do not find any good ground or reason to keep this petition pending any longer or to grant the reliefs prayed in the writ petition. However, it is expected from the Investigating Agency/ Officer to conduct and conclude the investigation strictly in accordance with law and the procedure so prescribed. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. [Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 19.8.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench