Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15695 (KAR)

K L J A KIRAN BABU v. MS NEELAM DHAWAN

WP/31459/2013 · 2025-03-03

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8944 WP No. 31459 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31459 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: K L J A KIRAN BABU AGE: 46 YEARS (DOB: 11TH APRIL 1967) R/AT 248/7B, 5TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS, VENKATAPURA, KORAMANGALA I BLOCK, BANGALORE-34 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K L J A KIRAN BABU .,PARTY-IN-PERSON-ABSENT) AND: 1. MS NEELAM DHAWAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE HEWLETT-PACKARD GLOBAL SOFT PRIVATE LIMITED, HP AVENUE, 39/40, ELECTRONIC CILTY, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560100 2. C.B.I., NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.R. ANAND., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. HEGDE DEVARU GANAPATHI., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 34, 37, 120B, 193, 325, 355, 370, 374, 30K7, 364, 387, 506 & 511 OF IPC PRAYING TO Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8944 WP No. 31459 of 2013 DIRECT THE CBI TO REGISTER THE CASE IN THIS REGARD, WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Court notice which has been issued to the petitioner has been returned with the endorsement “there was no such person”. 2. The matter being of the year 2013, a perusal of the order sheet indicates that there has been no appearance on several occasions. The matter was lastly listed in 2015 and thereafter came to be listed only in the year 2024. Noticing the absence of the petitioner (party-in-person), Court notice had been issued. 3. Since the notice issued to the petitioner (party-in- person) has been retuned with the endorsement “no such person”, there would be no purpose in retaining the file on record. Hence, the petition is dismissed - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8944 WP No. 31459 of 2013 for non-prosecution. Liberty is however being reserved to the petitioner (party-in-person) to seek for revival in the event of appearance. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20