Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15695 (GAU)

SHAHINA SULTANA AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1636/2025 · 2025-09-08

Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010150972025 2025:GAU-AS:12232 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1636/2025 SHAHINA SULTANA AND ANR W/O SHAHBAZ HAIDER PROPRIETOR OF M/S AIDA BITUMEX (GSTIN- 1BCCVPS4070H1ZX), HAVING ITS OFFICE AND GODOWAN AT- MIKIRPARA, SAKARDAI, MOUZA- RAMACHARANI, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM 2: MR SHAHBAZ HAIDER HUSBAND OF PETITIONER NO. 1 DE FACTO MANAGER AND AUTHORISED BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE OF M/S AIDA BITUMEX RESIDING AT THE SAME ADDRESS VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G RENGMA, A K JHA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard Mr. G. Rengma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K. K. Page No.# 2/2 Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State respondents. 2. This application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 read with Article 21 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners, namely (1) Smt. Shahina Sultana and (2) Mr. Shahbaz Haider, in connection with Summons dated 23.04.2025 and 28.05.2025 issued by the State GST Department under the provisions of Section 70 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017. 3. On instruction of the petitioners, Mr. Rengma, learned counsel submitted that this pre-arrest bail application has become infructuous and accordingly, he prays for withdrawal of this pre-arrest bail application, to which Mr. Das, learned Addl. PP has no objection. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant