[2025:RJ-JP:18659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5236/2025 Narendra @ Sameer S/o Rajesh, R/o Gurjar Dhani Badwala, Gram Panchayat Sanjay Nagar, Tehsil Khetri, Neem Ka Thana, Presently House No. E-36, Bhuneshwari Vatika, Bajari Mandi Road, Panchyawala, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. with Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. Mr. Rohit Kumar Meena, Adv. for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 02/05/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 02.04.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur in Bail Application No.28/2025 arising out of FIR No.531/2024, registered at Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of B.N.S., 2023 (later on for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 351(2)(3), 331(4), 127(2), 140(3), 115(2) and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023) by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:18659] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5236/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the charges levelled against the accused-applicant are for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 351(2)(3), 331(4), 127(2), 140(3), 115(2) and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel further submits that the co-accused Yashvardhan Singh @ Yash Rathod S/o Ajaypal Singh has been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.04.2025 (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No.5144/2025) and case of the present accused- applicant is not distinguishable from the co-accused-Yashvardhan. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant argues that both the parties have entered into compromise and settled their dispute amicably. Learned counsel also argues that the accused-applicant has paid all the money, which was received from the complainant- Hemendra Singh Shekhawat. Learned counsel further argues that since 22.12.2024, the accused-applicant is behind the bars and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused- applicant be granted benefit of bail. 4. Compromise deed has also been submitted before learned trial Court and copy of the compromise deed dated 12.03.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-3. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes this bail application. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant- respondent has admitted the factum of the compromise arrived at [2025:RJ-JP:18659] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5236/2025] between the parties and has no objection if the accused-applicant be released on bail. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the period of custody of the applicant; the fact that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court; the fact that parties have arrived at compromise as well as also considering the fact that the trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the applicant. 9. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Narendra @ Sameer S/o Rajesh, arrested in FIR No.531/2024, registered at Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur (West) shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /362-S.