Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15691 (GAU)

GIYASUDDIN @ GIYASUDDIN AHMED v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./2222/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010150472025 2025:GAU-AS:12319 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2222/2025 GIYASUDDIN @ GIYASUDDIN AHMED S/O- LATE KITAP ALI MONDAL @ KITAP ALI. R/O- VILL.- PACHIM PODOKHAT. P.S.- DHULA, DIST.- DARRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED, MR A. ALI,A. K. KANU Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 10.09.2025 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, 1. Giyasuddin @ Giyasuddin Ahmed, who is stated to be in under trial detention since 30.06.2025 and seeking regular bail in connection with Kharupetia P.S Case No. 72/2025 under Sections 61(2)/329(3)/118(2)/109(1)/74/351(3) of BNS. 3. The case arose out of an ejahar regarding allegations of conflict over land dispute followed by assault and serious injuries. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is also a cross FIR filed from the side of the accused herein against the informant’s side of the present police case regarding such conflicts and assaults. Two persons are also stated to have expired from the side of the present accused in the said conflict. 5. Case diary has been received. I have perused the relevant portions of it. Investigation has progressed but not yet complete. Some photographs of injured persons including that of the present accused is also seen which prima-facie gives the impression of serious injury. 6. Though the investigation is not completed but considering the apparent injuries of the accused and the length of detention – the above-named petitioner is allowed to go on bail of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) only with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the concerned learned court with following conditions:. Page No.# 3/3 I) That the petitioner shall maintain peace; II) That the petitioner shall not commit any offence; III) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 7. Violation of bail conditions might entail cancellation of the bail. 8. Return back the case diary. 9. With the above observations, this bail petition stands allowed and stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant