Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156900 (ALL)

NIJAMUDDIN v. SUB DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (JUDICIAL), TEHSIL TANDA, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS

A227/4795/2025 · 2025-08-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46744 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4795 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nijamuddin Respondent :- Sub District Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashwini Kumar,Raghvendra Verma,Ram Suphal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub District Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil - Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Restoration/recall application filed in Case No.T201704040302967) Bahalluddin vs. Sabbir Ahmed and others, filed under Section 229B of the UPZA & LR Act, 1950, pending in the court of respondent no.1, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub District Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil - Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub District Magistrate (Judicial), Tehsil - Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Restoration/recall application filed in Case No.T201704040302967) Bahalluddin vs. Sabbir Ahmed and others, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 11.8.2025 / KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench