ANKIT KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/7249/2025 · 2025-08-14
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47655-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7249 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ankit Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Shukla,Prachi Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard Sri Shashank Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yogesh Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this petition, petitioner has prayed for following main relief:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner which provides under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and also not harassing the petitioner as stated in the representation dated 05.08.2025, contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition."
4. Sri Yogesh Kumar Singh, learned AGA has informed on the basis of instructions that the petitioner is not being harassed by the police and the allegation so raised in the representation dated 05.08.2025 (Annexure No.1) are false and misconceived. Learned AGA has also apprised that the petitioner has already been filed an application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S. before the competent court. He has also submitted that the Circle Officer, Tarabganj, District Gonda has submitted a report dated 13.06.2025, wherein the fact has been indicated that the dispute between the parties is of civil nature.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, we hereby dispose of this petition finally directing the petitioner to take appropriate legal recourse before the competent authority or to approach the competent court of law, inasmuch the prayer prayed in the writ petition, may not be granted.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 Reena/- (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench