Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 156887 (ALL)

SAHDEV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

CRLA/2710/2024 · 2025-03-21

Alok Mathur

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16491 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2710 of 2024 Appellant :- Sahdev Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Appellant :- Rahul Singh Rana Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Gaurav Mehrotra,Rakesh Kumar Tripathi,Vijay Dixit Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Shri Rahul Singh Rana, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. 2. The grievance made by learned counsel for the appellant in the present criminal appeal is with regard to the order dated 29.07.2024, which has been impugned by the appellant. It was stated in the order, the trial court had indicated the date of the order as 29.07.2027 rather than 29.07.2024 and the next date fixed was 04.12.2023 instead of 04.12.2024. When the aforesaid facts were brought to the knowledge of this Court, then the learned counsel for the High Court was informed who had subsequently informed this Court that the instructions will be forwarded to the trial court and subsequently, a compliance report dated 23.10.2024 has been filed and subsequently, it has been informed that necessary corrections have been made in the record of the trial court. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant also does not contest the aforesaid facts and considering the grievance of the appellant stands redressed and the orders have been duly corrected in the original record of the trial court. No further grievance of the appellant subsists in the present appeal. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is consigned to record. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench