Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15686 (RAJ)

M/S PIONEER PESTICIDES PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2225/2025 · 2025-04-22

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16877] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2225/2025 M/s Pioneer Pesticides Pvt. Ltd., Office At SCO 82-83, 1st & 2nd Floor, Sector-8C, M Marg, Chandigarh - 160009 Through Its Authorized Representative Mr. Praveen Gupta ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Agriculture Officer (PO.S), Office Assistant Director (Agriculture Extension) Bundi Tehsil And District Bundi Raj. 3. Joint Director Agriculture (VI.) (PO.S), MU.NI. Agriculture Commissionerate, Pant Krishi Bhawan Jaipur, Raj. 4. Additional Director Agriculture (VI.) (PO.S), Kota Division Behind Kota Collector Raj Bhawan Road Nayapura Kota – 324001 ----Respondents/Non-Revisionists 5. M/s Mittal Krishi Kendra, Nainwa Through Pro. Rajesh Mittal S/o Shri Shanti Lal Resident Of Prem Shanti Bhawan Nagar Palika Ke Samne Bundi Road Nainwa District Bundi Raj. 9829184513 ----Respondent/Revisionist For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakhar Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. and Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 22/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 17.02.2025 passed by learned Special Court (SC ST Court), whereby, the application dated 19.12.2024 filed by the petitioner for impleading petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:16877] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2225/2025] as a party in the criminal revision petition filed by respondent No.5, was dismissed without considering the material on record. Further, it is submitted that proceedings against the petitioner under the provisions of Section 29(1)(A) of Insecticides Act, 1968 were initiated, for misbranding relating to the pesticides. Furthermore, it is submitted that the respondents have filed an application for re-testing/re-examination of all the samples of pesticides including the once which were verified to be a standard quality. Lastly, it is submitted that no order can be passed against the petitioner without impleading petitioner as a party, therefore, the said order is violative of principles of natural justice. Considering the facts of the case, this Court directs that the petitioner be impleaded as a party and be given audience before the concerned Court on 30.04.2025. Further, directs the concerned Court to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/20