- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25547-DB WP No. 2705 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 2705 OF 2023 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SMT NIRUPAMA C MOULY W/O RUPESH KUMAR AGED 33 YEARS WAS WORKING AT DISTRICT OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562110 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATISH K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE 560001 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560001. Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25547-DB WP No. 2705 of 2023 3. PRAMOD L PATIL S/O LAKSHMANGOUDA B PATIL AGED 35 YEARS KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE (JUNIOR SCALE) PRESENTLY WORKING AS DISTRICT OFFICER DEPT. OF BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562110 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2 SRI.RAGHAVENDRA G GAYATHRI, ADV. FOR R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (a) CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN RESPECT OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23/01/2023 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.6228/2022 (ANNEXURE-A); (b) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23/01/2023 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN APPLICATION NO.6228/2022 (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE APPLICATION NO.6228/2022 PREFERRED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL (ANNEXURE-B) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR Preliminary HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25547-DB WP No. 2705 of 2023 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Learned counsel Sri.K.Sathish would submit that prayer of the petitioner would no more survive for consideration in view of subsequent developments i.e., transfer of the petitioner from Bangalore Rural to Bangalore Urban where the petitioner has taken charge on 05.11.2024. The same is not disputed by learned counsel Sri.Raghavendra G Gayathri for respondent No.3 so also by Sri.B.Ravindranath learned AGA for respondents No.1 and 2. 2. Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE MPK CT:bms