RAJENDRA RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/6475/2025 · 2025-08-08
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 156851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46290 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6475 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajendra Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar,Ajeet Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the proceedings arising out of Complaint Case No. 451 of 2023 Saiyad Izhar Mehndi Vs. Rajendra Ram, Under Section 138 N.I. Act; Police Station- Baskhari, District- Ambedkar Nagar pending before the Learned Additional Civil Judge (C.D.) / Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ambedkar Nagar and also quash the Summoning Order dated 02.06.2016 as well as BW
order dated 04.07.2025 passed by Learned Additional Civil Judge (C.D.) /Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ambedkar Nagar, contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this affidavit, in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is
disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and
decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer/Court concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard no application shall be entertained. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is
disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.8.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench