IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3258 of 2024 Ghaneshyam Mahto, son of late Fagu Ram Mahto, resident of Virat Nagar, Lowadih, P.O and P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s) Vs. 1. Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) through its Member Secretary, Damodar Valley Corporation, VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal- 700054. 2. The Addl. Secretary, Damodar Valley Corporation, VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal- 700054. 3. The Executive Director (HR), Damodar Valley Corporation, VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal- 700054. 4. The Senior Divisional Engineer, Human Resource Development Department, Damodar Valley Corporation, VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal- 700054. 5. The Chief Engineer (H.O.P) KTPS, Damodar Valley Corporation, Koderma, P.O.-Bhajhedih, P.S. Jainagar, District- Koderma. 6. The Deputy General Manager (Adm.) KTPS, Damodar Valley Corporation, Koderma, P.O.-Bhajhedih, P.S. Jainagar, District- Koderma …. Respondent(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): Mr. Neil Abhbijit Toppo, Advocate. For the DVC: M/s Sanjoy Piprawall & Prince Kumar, Advocates. ------- 04/03.01.2025: Counsel for the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if the respondents are directed to disposed of the representation of the petitioner in relation to anomaly of pay. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that his juniors are being paid higher scale than the petitioner, to which he has already objected and represented before the Executive Director (HR) Damoder Valley Corporation (DVC), VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, which has yet to be decided. 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that his junior namely, one Vishwanath Prasad Sharma is getting higher pay than him, which according to the petitioner is discriminatory. 4. Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, learned counsel for the D.V.C submits that if a fresh representation is filed before the Executive Director (HR) Damodar Valley Corporation, VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, annexing all necessary documents, the same will be considered by the authority and an appropriate order will be passed. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation annexing all the documents, which the petitioner is relying upon including the documents to show that he is being discriminated by one Vishwanath Sharma, before the respondent No. 3- the Executive Director (HR) Damoder Valley Corporation, VIP Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, within six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent No. 3 will dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law, within a period of six weeks thereafter and will communicated the same to the petitioner. If the authority finds that the petitioner's grievance needs to be redressed, the same should be redressed within the aforesaid period. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Anu/- (ANANDA SEN, J. )