IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10695 of 2017 ====================================================== 1. Amir Chandra Bosak 2. Galli Prasad Bosak Both are Sons of late Sahdev lal Bosak 3. Kamal Deo Basak Son of Anchit Lal Bosak All are Residents of Village- Marwa, post- marwa, Police Station- Baisi,District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Purnea , District- Purnea. 3. The Additional Collector, Land Reforms, District Purnea. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Baisi, Purnea. 5. The Circle officer, Baisi Circle, District- Purnea. 6. The Halka Karmachari of Halka No. 5, Baisi Circle, Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Yadav-Gp15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 21-04-2025 Heard Mr. Helal Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. The writ petition has been filed:- “for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction, to the respondent no. 5 and 6 to accept the rent of lands of Mauza Sultan Ghutta, Thana No.426, Khata No.73, PlotNo. 82 / 285 total Area 3 Acres 7 Decimal of lands which were settled in the name of Anant Lal Bosak, Grandfather of Petitioners and the Petitioners were paying the rent to the state of Bihar but the respondent No.5 and 6 refused to accept the rent of Patna High Court CWJC No.10695 of 2017(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 lands described herein where without any reason and orally threatened to evict from the land in question though the respondent had given an under taking before this Hon'ble High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 1558 of 1983 disposed of on 22.04.1991 that the petitioners are not going to be dispossessed and the respondents no.5 and 6 used to grant rent situated settlee of lands.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be satisfied if the petition preferred before the Circle Officer, Baisi, Purnea in the year 2016 and still not decided as per his information, be disposed of. 4. In view of limited prayer, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.5-the Circle Officer, Baisi, Purnea to decide the matter if the same has still not be decided in next four months. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of. perwez (Rajiv Roy, J) U