Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:25024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 472 of 2024
--------- Kameshwar Choubey Aged About 60 Years, S/o Surendra Nath Choubey, R/O village, Majhganwan Post : Majhganwan Thana: Bhawnathpur Garhwa, Jharkhand 822120. ....Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Ms Vandena Dadel, D/o Not Known to Petitioners, presently holding the Post of Secretary/Principal Secretary Department of Forest, Environment Climate Change Having Office at Nepal House, Doranda at PO & PS Doranda, Ranchi.
3. Mr. Nand Kishor Singh S/o Not Known to Petitioner Presently Holding the post of Managing Director Cum Upper Principal Chief Forest Conservator Jharkhand State Forest Development Corp. Ltd having office at Gate No. 5 of Ashok Nagar PO & PS Argora, Ranchi 834002.
4. Md. Shaba Alam Ansari S/o Not Known to Petitioners presently holding the post of General Manager, Minor Forest Produce Circle, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Limited PO & PS & Dist: Hazaribagh Jharkhand.
5. Mr. Shiv Kumar Prasad, S/o Not Known to Petitioners Presently Holdong the Post of Divisional Manager, Minor Forest Produce Project Division, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Limited having PO & PS & Dist: Garhwa.
6. Mr. Sovendra Kumar S/O Not known to Petitioners, Presently Holding the post of Divisional Manager, Minor Forest Produce Project Division, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Limited, having PO & PS Dist: Daltonganj, Jharkhand.
7. Mr Ravindra Nath Marandi, S/o Not Known to Petitioners, Presently Holding the Post of Divisional Manager, Minor Forest Produce Project Division, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Limited PO & PS Dist Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
....Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amandeep Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. Ashutosh Anand No.2, A.C. to G.P.-IV
--------- 07/Dated:- 22.08.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
2.
There is no opposition from the opposite parties.
3.
Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-