Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010200752018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 8704/2018 Between: V. Issac ...PETITIONER AND Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY
2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in withholding the pension amounts of the petitioner to a tune of Rs.30,504/- as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to release the amounts withheld with interest forthwith to the petitioner.”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
2
4. Learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 8704 of 2018
26.03.2025
Mjl /*